Canadian Premed and Medical Schools  

Go Back   Canadian Premed and Medical Schools > University of British Columbia Medical School
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 11-15-2011, 08:00 PM
niceshrp niceshrp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 68
Default

Wait, so if you are currently in your 4th year of undergrad, you are not eligible for the worst-year GPA removal right?
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 11-15-2011, 08:11 PM
gourmet gourmet is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 85
Default

boring day, at least they released the stats. i'm expecting an onslaught of regrets tomorrow
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 11-15-2011, 08:41 PM
kylamonkey's Avatar
kylamonkey kylamonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Land of the Midnight Sun
Posts: 2,106
Send a message via Skype™ to kylamonkey
Default

I need about 45/50 on my NAQ to get an interview, which is about what I would have guessed before the process- basically I'm still a long shot but we'll have to see if they seem to be using std dev to do NAQ this year.
__________________
TEAM PERSISTENCE - kylamonkey
Interview invite- U of Calgary
2013
Regrets post interview
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 11-15-2011, 08:46 PM
FMX's Avatar
FMX FMX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kylamonkey View Post
I need about 45/50 on my NAQ to get an interview, which is about what I would have guessed before the process- basically I'm still a long shot but we'll have to see if they seem to be using std dev to do NAQ this year.
^thats super difficult to do imo.. 45/50 you'd basically be just short of god
how did you fare last year on NAQ kyla?
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 11-15-2011, 09:08 PM
gourmet gourmet is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kylamonkey View Post
I need about 45/50 on my NAQ to get an interview, which is about what I would have guessed before the process- basically I'm still a long shot but we'll have to see if they seem to be using std dev to do NAQ this year.
how would that work? (ie. using std dev)
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 11-15-2011, 09:10 PM
muhgel muhgel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ubcMDhopeful View Post
I tried a polynomial line and it seems that it is a much better fit.


the equation is

AQ SCORE = -0.1022*(GPA%)^2 + 20.682*(GPA%) - 987.19


Rē = 0.9999


EDIT: This is a fitline for the 85-90 range dont think it applies to <85 or >90
you didn't factor in pre-req % in your regression..
"Qualified applicants received an academic file review which included: review of prerequisites, calculation of the overall average (OGPA), derived from all university-level transferrable courses and the removal, when applicable, of the worst academic year to give an adjusted academic average (AGPA)."
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 11-15-2011, 09:17 PM
Rwethereyet Rwethereyet is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 99
Default

From the interim stats .pdf:

British Columbia Applicants (BC)
File reviews were completed for 1066 applicants who were identified as BC residents. A total of 560 BC residents who achieved a total file review score of 60.49/100 or more were invited to interview.

I did the same calculation last year (I don't have last year's interim stats handy however), and I remember that 60% of BC applicants received an interview.

We're down to 52% now, folks.
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 11-15-2011, 09:23 PM
ubcMDhopeful's Avatar
ubcMDhopeful ubcMDhopeful is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muhgel View Post
you didn't factor in pre-req % in your regression..
"Qualified applicants received an academic file review which included: review of prerequisites, calculation of the overall average (OGPA), derived from all university-level transferrable courses and the removal, when applicable, of the worst academic year to give an adjusted academic average (AGPA)."
You are correct, I did not know that pre reqs are looked at pre interview. That just adds a whole nother layer making the math very difficult if not impossible lol.
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 11-15-2011, 09:32 PM
sfuguy sfuguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 316
Talking

They look at prereqs they dont calculate anything using them preinterview !
__________________
_____________________________
Team Persistence - SfuGuy
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 11-15-2011, 09:34 PM
LJ1000F LJ1000F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ubcMDhopeful View Post
You are correct, I did not know that pre reqs are looked at pre interview. That just adds a whole nother layer making the math very difficult if not impossible lol.
Quick question. What does it mean that the prereqs are looked at? Is that to imply there is a separate AQ calculation for just your prereqs and a separate one for all your other courses and both somehow effect your score. Or basically how is the system different from just taking all your courses and averaging them and entering that into a formula that gives you your AQ (assuming no dropping of lowest marks etc). Thanks for any insight you can provide
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.